Connect with us

Published

on

Short links have become an essential part of today’s online experience. Many internet users click on bit.ly, ow.ly or other links created by a URL shortener without hesitation. However, short links can pose significant privacy and security threats that are often overlooked.

Short links make Internet browsing and messaging easier and faster, especially on mobile devices. It can also improve social media sharing because message length is often limited.

Most people just copy and paste the automatically shortened link, and most popular URL shortening services allow users to customize the name of the ‘new’ web address. But therein lies the problem. Unlike traditional URLs, short links do not allow the user to hover over and see what the actual website address is. So, in most cases, you can’t be sure what’s waiting for you at the other end of a shortened URL until you get there.

If cybercriminals exploit a zero-click vulnerability in a web browser, infection can occur the moment a user enters the malicious website. Cybercriminals can also use link shortening tools to change the target address as needed.

For example, in a situation where attackers send phishing messages containing some type of link, but the phishing site they created to land on is blocked, rehosting it at a different address is not a problem if they use URL shorteners for the links in their letters. Often, multiple redirects are used to further blur the tracks.

Short links
Some link shortening tools allow tracking the actions of those who click the link on the actual target site. This is effectively an intermediary attack: it allows traffic to pass through an intermediary service node that monitors all data exchanged between the user and the target site.

Therefore, the URL shortener can potentially capture entered credentials, social network messages, and the like. Moreover, such links can be used for doxing and other types of tracking if the URL shortener service offers advanced functionality.Top of Form

In most cases, short links for public use are placed in social network posts or web pages. However, if it is sent to a user personally – in a messaging program or in an email sent to a personal or business address – additional risks arise. Using such links, an attacker who has already collected some information about the user can redirect the potential victim to a phishing site where some personal data has been pre-populated. For example, it might redirect to a copy of a banking site that includes a request to enter a valid username and password, or to a service’s “payment gateway” that has a pre-populated personal debit card number and prompts the user to enter a security code.

Never clicking on a shortened URL is not an option given how common and useful they have become. For the most part, URL shorteners are used for legitimate purposes and are completely safe.

However, there are threat actors who want to take advantage of the trust people place in a service, so it becomes important for users to be careful. If a link raises suspicion, is in a resent message, comes from an unfamiliar email, or comes from an unknown person, an easy way to examine the link is GetLinkInfo or UnshortenIt. You can copy and paste it into a tool like:

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Security

OpenAI Security Crisis Begins: Researcher Resigns

After some developments, the OpenAI security crisis began. A researcher at OpenAI resigned, alleging that security processes were being pushed into the background. Jan Leike stated that security was disregarded and announced that he resigned from his post for this reason.

Published

on

After some developments, the OpenAI security crisis began. A researcher at OpenAI resigned, alleging that security processes were being pushed into the background. Jan Leike stated that security was disregarded and announced that he resigned from his post for this reason.

Jan Leike, who left his post at the beginning of last week, said in a statement on Twitter: “In recent years, security culture and processes have been pushed into the background for the sake of shiny products.” Leike, OpenAI’s human-like He stated that he did not pay enough attention to security protocols in the process of developing artificial intelligence that can think. These revelations revealed growing tensions within OpenAI and concerns about managing the potential dangers of artificial intelligence.

OpenAI Security Crisis Begins: Superalignment Team Disbanded

Leike led the Superalignment team at OpenAI. This team was carrying out critical work to ensure artificial intelligence security. However, according to Wired’s report, OpenAI completely disbanded this team. Leike, his team’s security He said that he could not access the resources he needed and this eventually led to his resignation. This development shows that there is a serious problem in the internal workings of OpenAI.

OpenAI security crisis has begun

Following Leike’s resignation, he took over security duties at OpenAI from one of the company’s founders. John Schulman will take over. Schulman was one of those who previously supported CEO Sam Altman. This security crisis at OpenAI had a huge impact in the world of artificial intelligence. Since OpenAI is one of the few companies leading the field of artificial intelligence, such infighting attracts attention in the industry.

OpenAI Security Crisis Has Begun: Concerns About AI Security

In his statements after his resignation, Leike emphasized that OpenAI should make serious preparations regarding the dangers that artificial intelligence will pose. “Only then can we ensure that artificial intelligence is beneficial for all humanity,” said Leike. company’s security policies He stated that he did not pay enough attention to it. This incident raised questions about how adequate OpenAI’s security policies are.

at OpenAI This phenomenon in the field of artificial intelligence security measures It started new discussions about how it should be taken. So, what do you think about this? You can share your opinions with us in the comments section below.

Continue Reading

Security

Dell Became the New Target of Hackers

Dell has become the new target of hackers. Dell was shaken by the recent security breach and announced that the personal information of millions of its customers was in danger. Here are the details and effects of this event:

Published

on

Dell has become the new target of hackers. Dell was shaken by the recent security breach and announced that the personal information of millions of its customers was in danger. Here are the details and effects of this event:

The data breach occurred due to a vulnerability in Dell’s security systems. 49 million customers revealed that his personal information was at risk. This incident poses a serious concern for the security and privacy of Dell users.

Dell Became the New Target of Hackers: Stealing Customer Information

According to the company’s statement, it is stated that financial information such as credit cards were not stolen as a result of the data breach. However, user name information, physical address information, order information and service It is stated that important personal data such as product information has been violated. This situation poses a concern for the privacy and security of victims.

Stolen data It is available for sale on the Dark Web reported. This increases the risk of victims’ personal information falling into the hands of malicious individuals. Currently, all sales data from 2017 to 2024 is accessible, affecting millions of Dell customers.

Dell is the new target of hackers

Dell Became the New Target of Hackers: Dell’s Response and Customer Recommendations

Dell announced that after detecting the incident, it immediately implemented incident response procedures and began investigating. The company provides customers with when they notice suspicious activity to report their concerns [email protected] recommends that you apply to: It also provides technical support and tips to avoid phone scams.

Dell’s This security gap not only undermines the company’s reputation but also privacy of millions of customers puts it in danger. This incident once again reveals how important digital security measures are.

Dell’s data security breach data protection and security indicates that it needs to review its measures. However, this crisis also emphasizes the need to raise awareness about digital security and take steps for a safer digital future.

Continue Reading

News

Neuralink’s Founder Left Due to Security Concerns

Dr. one of the founders of Elon Musk’s brain chip project Neuralink. Benjamin Rapoport said he left the project due to security concerns.

Published

on

Dr. one of the founders of Elon Musk’s brain chip project Neuralink. Benjamin Rapoport said he left the project due to security concerns.

Elon Musk, who continues to walk the fine line between crazy and genius by adding a new one to his crazy projects every day, has become a completely controversial figure, especially after purchasing Twitter. However, the craziest thing Elon Musk has done recently is not buying Twitter. Because he is also busy installing chips in human brains. Musk’s latest project, Neuralink, which has been at the center of discussions since the day it was announced, recently started human experiments. Even the first reports about the development of the first people with a chip implanted in their brains were published.

However, the fact that there have been no serious problems in human experiments so far does not mean that concerns about this project have disappeared. On the contrary, the progress of this project worries many people. One of these people is Dr., one of the founders of the project. Benjamin Rapoport.

Neuralink is under federal investigation

Dr. recently participated in the Wall Street Journal’s podcast The Future of Everything. Benjamin Rapoport explained why he left the company he founded. Dr. is a successful neurosurgeon. Rapoport decided to leave the company due to security concerns told.

As one of the people who laid the foundations of this project, Dr. Rapoport is not against the idea of ​​implanting chips into the human brain. Even today, he is working on similar projects with his new company. However, Dr. Rapoport found Neuralink’s approach to the issue under Musk management wrong. Although Rapoport does not go into full detail, it appears that he disagrees on how much control these chips will have over the human brain. This will further strengthen concerns about the progress of the project.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 RAZORU NEWS.
Project by V