Connect with us



In fact, at first these two companies had a very good relationship, but over time the balance shifted and these two friends became bitter enemies. So how did their rivalry come about?

Let’s take a closer look at the two companies’ highly contested battle

Apple has actually been in a struggle with many competitors since day one.

IBM in the 80s, Microsoft in the 90s, Google in the 2000s. But the competition between Apple and Samsung is much more unique and contentious. Since day one, Samsung has not only competed with Apple in the laptop, tablet and smartphone markets.

It also supplied Apple with key components for its devices. The iPhone’s screen, for example.

So, with such a relationship between them, for what reasons did the two companies fall out?

Each of us knows Samsung for the products they sell for consumer electronics. But this business sector, which encompasses phones, computers and tablets, is a new development given the company’s history. This is because Samsung started its journey with only parts manufacturing.

In the 80s, the priority of this company was actually the supply of components (semiconductor materials) and Lee Byung-chull, Samsung’s managing director at the time, had several meetings with Steve Jobs to exchange ideas on whether to continue supplying these components or open up to other business ideas.

In the meantime, Samsung had decided to make a move towards a new chip factory and the relationship between the two was quite amicable.

Apple remains Samsung’s biggest customer, supplying millions of dollars worth of electronic components. But this collaborative relationship between Apple and Samsung did not last forever.

Samsung’s general manager visited Apple’s headquarters in 2007, before the first iPhone was announced, and Steve Jobs explained to him how the iPhone technology worked. The fear was realized and Samsung adapted the technology for its own products.

Just two years later, Samsung launched the Galaxy smartphone running on Google’s Android operating system.

Jobs then claimed that Android was a stolen product and called Samsung a copycat. It was also at this point that Samsung stopped being Apple’s ally and became Apple’s enemy, and a long legal battle between the two companies began in 2011.

In fact, Apple had already told Samsung in 2010 that its smartphones and tablets were infringing Apple’s patents, and Apple was willing to settle since the two companies were in a business alliance.

Apple offered Samsung a deal in which it would pay Samsung $40 per tablet and $30 per phone, but Samsung rejected the offer, arguing that its products do not infringe any patents.

Thus, Apple, unable to reach a settlement after a year, did not hold back from filing a lawsuit.

Apple’s defense in the lawsuit was as follows: “Instead of pursuing independent product development, Samsung chose to blindly copy Apple’s distinctive interfaces, innovative technology, and unique product and packaging design in violation of Apple’s intellectual property rights.”

But did Samsung really imitate the iPhone? Considering the design and technology of Samsung products before and after the iPhone, it is possible to see that Samsung has benefited greatly from the iPhone’s innovations.

Apple has made a total of 16 different claims against Samsung, but 3 of them stand out.

Trade dress infringement, trademark infringement and infringement of design patents. The first of these, trade dress, is the visual appearance that represents the source of a product or its packaging.

For example, the first iMac was imitated by an American company called eMachines with a product called eOne, which was no doubt a copy of the hugely popular iMac. But Apple was not successful in suing the company for trade dress.

Apple has suggested that since it has faced such a case in the past for the iMac, it has been subjected to the same imitation by Samsung for its various devices such as the iPhone and iPad.

In terms of trademark infringement, Samsung could claim that the similarity in hardware design was a coincidence, but could not easily defend similarities in software elements such as icons.

There are, of course, dozens or even thousands of ways to design an icon, but Samsung chose to use the same images as Apple. The infringement of design patents involved the home screen icon layout, the form factor of the iPhone case, and the screen and button designs.

In summary, when all these elements were brought together, striking claims were made about branding, type design and hardware design.

And how did the court rule on all these charges?

The juries ruled in Apple’s favor, ordering Samsung to pay Apple $1 billion in damages for its infringement and not to do so in any of its future products. But this court ruling was not the end of the story.

Samsung appealed the decision and filed a lawsuit against Apple. It argued that the products did not infringe its patents. The legal wrangling that followed this legal court process lasted for years, with both sides making some gains and suffering some losses.

Apple succeeded in getting Samsung’s Galaxy Tab series banned in Germany, forcing Samsung to redesign the device.

However, Samsung was not always to blame in this dispute. Apple was found guilty of infringing Samsung’s cellular data patent with the AT&T iPhone 4, 3GS and 3G, and the original iPad and iPad 2 models with 3G data radios.

Such an offense would have meant that Apple would have been banned from selling AT&T models of certain iPhones and iPads in the US, but the White House vetoed the decision.

Ultimately, the 7-year-long battle ended in June 2018, when Apple and Samsung reached a compromise over an agreement of unclear content. Although it is not known what the deal was about, it was clear that this difficult process had taken its toll on both sides.

But in a statement, Apple clearly saw this legal battle as a victory.

“We believe deeply in the value of design and our teams work tirelessly to create innovative products that delight our customers. This case has always been about more than money. Apple sparked the smartphone revolution with the iPhone and Samsung has clearly copied our design.

It’s important that we continue to protect the hard work and innovation of so many people at Apple. We are grateful to the jury for their service and are pleased that they recognized that Samsung should pay for copying our products.” Samsung, on the other hand, preferred not to comment on the issue.

After 7 years of protracted and contentious litigation, one might think that Apple and Samsung are now two different companies that have nothing to do with each other, but this is not the case.

Samsung continues to supply Apple with key components for its most popular products. For example, the OLED display for all models in the iPhone 15 series is made by Samsung, and Samsung is the only manufacturer from which Apple orders OLED panels.

In fact, Apple’s plan was to source panels from China’s BOE as well as Samsung, but as with the previous series of the iPhone, BOE again failed to meet Apple’s quality standards, leaving Apple to rely entirely on Samsung.

In short, Apple relies on Samsung to provide high-quality, diverse components that can be mass-produced on a large scale, while Samsung is confident that Apple will buy its components.

So the damage or destruction of either company means that the other will clearly follow suit. Perhaps it will be possible to see more different collaborations between Apple and Samsung in the future.

What do you think about these two companies, which are often in competition with each other, but in some ways are also pregnant with each other?

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Science and Space

NASA is looking for volunteers to live in a Mars simulation for a year

If extreme challenges are your thing, NASA has the perfect opportunity for you. The space agency on Friday announced the Crew Health and Performance Research Analogue, a year-long simulated Mars mission. Here are all the details.



If extreme challenges are your thing, NASA has the perfect opportunity for you. The space agency on Friday announced the Crew Health and Performance Research Analogue, a year-long simulated Mars mission. Here are all the details.

During the mission, which begins in spring 2025, the four selected crew members will be housed in a 1,700-square-foot 3D-printed living space in Houston. NASA is accepting applications through the CHAPEA website from now until April 2. This is a paid job, but NASA has not publicly disclosed how much participants will be paid. The Mars Dune Alpha habitat at NASA’s Johnson Space Center was designed to simulate what life might be like on the red planet, where the environment would be harsh and resources limited. There is currently a crew living and working there as part of the first CHAPEA mission, which has completed more than half of the 378-day mission. During their stay, volunteers will maintain the habitat and grow crops, among other tasks. The living area also includes a 1,200-square-foot sandbox for simulated spacewalks.

NASA is looking for volunteers to live in a Mars simulation for a year

Applicants must be a US resident between the ages of 30-55 to be considered. citizen It is required to speak English at a good level and have a master’s degree in the STEM field, as well as to have at least two years of professional experience, to have piloted an aircraft for at least a thousand hours, or to have two years of professional experience. Certain types of professional experience may also allow applicants without a master’s degree to qualify. CHAPEA 2 is the second of three missions NASA has planned for the program, with the first launching on June 25, 2023.

Continue Reading


Nintendo Switch 2 may not arrive until 2025

We have sad news for Nintendo lovers. Here are all the details.



We have sad news for Nintendo lovers. Here are all the details.

Nintendo’s “switch The 2″ game was expected to be released this year, but a new rumor has called this timeline into question. Now the company is telling publishers that the next-gen console is planned to be released in the first quarter of 2025, according to VGC, Eurogamer and other sources. This is a date in line with the launch of the original Switch, which was announced in October 2016 but came out in March 2017. Various sources have also said that the company is working on Switch 2 games, which are planned to be released in early 2025. One of the important games may be the long-delayed Metroid Prime 4. However, no specific date has been included in Nintendo’s release schedule.

Nintendo Switch 2 may not arrive until 2025

Earlier this month, the company slightly raised its fiscal 2024 Switch sales forecast from 15 million to 15.5 million, compared to 18 million and 23 million in 2022 and 2021. According to Reuters, Nintendo’s shares fell today due to rumors of a launch delay.

Not much is known about the future device, including its name. Rumors suggest it will have 4K capabilities and visual quality similar to the PS5 and Series X, as well as backwards compatibility with the Switch. In any case, if the new console is released, this will be a busy year for the company. It will be announced in the first quarter of 2025, possibly at a Nintendo Direct showcase later this year. However, for now, we can say that fans will have to wait a bit. We hope that they will finally be able to get the games they want.

Apple announces web apps will no longer work on European iOS devices

Continue Reading


Apple announces that web apps will no longer work on European iOS devices

Apple announced a surprising decision for European users. Here are all the details.



Apple announced a surprising decision for European users. Here are all the details.

In updated notes shared by TechCrunch, Apple explained why it disabled progressive web apps in the EU. The news comes after users noticed that their web apps were no longer functional in Europe with the latest iOS 17.4 beta releases. Apple, European Digital markets He said that this feature is blocked in the region due to new rules regarding browsers in the Act (DMA). Much like native apps, web apps allow for private windowing, notifications, long-term local storage, and more. European users who tap on web app icons will see a message asking if they want to open them in Safari or cancel them. This means that they cause problems such as data loss and corrupted notifications because they are perceived more like web shortcuts.

Apple announces web apps will no longer work on European iOS devices

According to Apple, this is a necessary move. “Addressing the complex security and privacy concerns associated with web applications that use alternative browser engines will require the creation of an entirely new integration architecture not currently available in iOS, which will improve our capabilities,” the company wrote. But the Open Web Advocacy organization disagrees. “Some argue that Apple’s decision to remove Web Applications is a necessary response to the DMA, but this is the wrong approach,” the organization shared on its blog, claiming that there were other reasons behind the company’s decision.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2023 RAZORU NEWS. Project by V